Research and practice priorities in pilonidal sinus disease: a consensus from the PITSTOP study.

AIM: Pilonidal sinus disease is a common condition treated by colorectal surgeons. There is a lack of literature in the field to guide optimal management of this condition. As part of the PITSTOP study, we aimed to identify policy and research priorities to provide direction to the field. METHOD: Patients and surgeons were invited to participate. A 'So what, now what' exercise was conducted, informed by data from PITSTOP. This generated statements for research and practice priorities. A three-round online Delphi study was conducted, ranking statements based on policy and research separately. Statements were rated 1 (not important) to 9 (important). Statements that were rated 7-9 by more than 70% of participants were entered into the consensus meeting. Personalized voting feedback was shown between rounds. A face-to-face meeting was held to discuss statements, and participants were asked to rank statements using a weighted choice vote. RESULTS: Twenty-two people participated in the focus group, generating 14 research and 19 policy statements. Statements were voted on by 56 participants in round 1, 53 in round 2 and 51 in round 3. A total of 15 policy statements and 19 research statements were discussed in the consensus round. Key policy statements addressed treatment strategies and intensity, surgeon training opportunities, need for classification and the impact of treatment on return to work. Research recommendations included design of future trials, methodology considerations and research questions. CONCLUSION: This study has identified research and policy priorities in pilonidal sinus disease which are relevant to patients and clinicians. These should inform practice and future research.

Classification and stratification in pilonidal sinus disease: findings from the PITSTOP cohort.

AIM: Research in pilonidal disease faces several challenges, one of which is consistent and useful disease classification. The International Pilonidal Society (IPS) proposed a four-part classification in 2017. The aim of this work was to assess the validity and reliability of this tool using data from the PITSTOP cohort study. METHOD: Face validity was assessed by mapping the items/domains in the IPS tool against tools identified through a systematic review. Key concepts were defined as those appearing in more than two-thirds of published tools. Concurrent and predictive validity were assessed by comparing key patient-reported outcome measures between groups at baseline and at clinic visit. The outcomes of interest were health utility, Cardiff Wound Impact Questionnaire (CWIQ) and pain score between groups. Significance was set at p = 0.05 a priori. Interrater reliability was assessed using images captured during the PITSTOP cohort. Ninety images were assessed by six raters (two experts, two general surgeons and two trainees), and classified into IPS type. Interrater reliability was assessed using the unweighted kappa and unweighted Gwet's AC1 statistics. RESULTS: For face validity items represented in the IPS were common to other classification systems. Concurrent and predictive validity assessment showed differences in health utility and pain between groups at baseline, and for some treatment groups at follow-up. Assessors agreed the same classification in 38% of participants [chance-corrected kappa 0.52 (95% CI 0.42-0.61), Gwet's AC1 0.63 (95% CI 0.56-0.69)]. CONCLUSION: The IPS classification demonstrates key aspects of reliability and validity that would support its implementation.

Preoperative and Intraoperative Risk Factors for Conversion of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy to Open Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review of 30 Studies.

This systematic review aims to review articles that evaluate the risk of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy and to analyze the identified preoperative and intraoperative risk factors. The bibliographic databases CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, Medline, and PubMed were searched according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Only English-language retrospective studies and systematic reviews with more than 200 patients were included. The time of publication was limited from 2012 to 2022. Our systematic review identified 30 studies with a total of 108,472 patients. Of those, 92,765 cholecystectomies were commenced laparoscopically and 5,477 were converted to open cholecystectomy (5.90%). The rate of conversion ranges from 2.50% to 50%. Older males with acute cholecystitis, previous abdominal surgery, symptom duration of more than 72 hours, previous history of acute cholecystitis, C-reactive protein (CRP) value of more than 76 mg/L, diabetes, and obesity are significant preoperative risk factors for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Significant intraoperative risk factors for conversion include gallbladder inflammation, adhesions, anatomic difficulty, Nassar scale of Grades 3 to 4, Conversion from Laparoscopic to Open Cholecystectomy (CLOC) score of more than 6 and 10-point gallbladder operative scoring system (G10) score more than 3.

Cystic Lymph Node Identification Is More Reliable Than Critical View of Safety in Difficult Cholecystectomies.

BACKGROUND: The cystic lymph node (CLN) represents an anatomic safety marker and a surrogate marker of technique during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). We aim to demonstrate the value of CLN in comparison to the critical view of safety (CVS) and study the effects of increasing difficulty on the 2 approaches. METHODS: A prospective study of consecutive LC was conducted. Patient demographics, type of admission, clinical presentation, operative difficulty grade, visualization of CLN, identification of CVS, operative time, and complications were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Of 393 LCs, half of the admissions were emergencies. Thirty-four percent had obstructive jaundice or acute cholecystitis. The CLN was visually identified in 81.7% with a small difference between operative difficulty grades 1 to 3 versus 4 to 5. Although CVS was unachievable in 62 patients, 43 (69.4%) still had an identifiable CLN. The median operating time was 68 minutes with 1 mortality but no conversions or intraoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying the CLN during LC could compliment the CVS in avoiding major ductal injury. Dissecting lateral to the CLN to commence the process of displaying the cystic pedicle structures may be a strategy in safely achieving the CVS. During the more difficult LC where displaying the CVS is impossible, the CLN may be the key anatomic landmark.

Post-mortem general surgeon reflection on decision-making: a mixed-methods study of mortality audit data.

BACKGROUND: Surgical deaths in Australia require the treating surgeon to document the event via a standard report. A section of this report invites surgeons to reflect on changes to management they would initiate in retrospect. This study analyses these reflective statements and categorizes them in an effort to gain insight into reflective learning. METHODS: This audit-based cross-sectional study involves patients who died in-hospital under the care of general surgeons in Queensland, Australia, between July 2007 and December 2016. Retrospective surgeon statements were analysed using both quantitative and qualitative methods. RESULTS: Of the 2575 surgeons, 459 (18%) indicated they would manage their patient differently in retrospect. Half of these statements (46%) concerned changes to an operative decision. Of this group, most of these concerned either the decision to operate or not (26%), what operation to perform (32%) or earlier timing of surgery (32%). Overall, one-third of statements (29%) concerned retrospective changes to clinical decisions not related to operative management. Communication considerations, ceiling of care decisions and technical operative changes made up smaller proportions of statements. CONCLUSION: This mixed-methods study has identified a minority of surgeons proffer retrospective management changes after their patient has died. Of those who do, decision-making around operative management is the most common area of reflective consideration.

Inter-surgeon Variability in Cystic Artery Lymph Node Excision during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Introduction Expert opinion recommends that surgeons perform a laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in a standardized manner by dissecting the hepatobiliary triangle lateral to the cystic artery lymph node (LN) to minimize the rate of a major bile duct injury. Methods To determine whether surgeons performed a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a standardized manner, the study assessed the variability in the frequency of an LN excision. All LCs that were performed at a single hospital were identified from a prospective dataset. The presence of an LN was retrospectively determined from the histology report. Results Twenty-seven surgeons were recorded to have performed 2332 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Out of the total number of patients, 76.8% were female. The median patient age was 42.4 years. About 60.8% of the LCs were elective, while 39.2% of them were acute. Nineteen pathologists reported that in 99% of the specimens - the LN status of 1831 (78.5%) gallbladders was reported and analyzed. Overall, the LN yield per surgeon varied from 0% to 50% (mean 18.7%). Conclusion  The high inter-surgeon variability in the rate of LN excision during laparoscopic cholecystectomy shows that surgeons dissect the hepatobiliary triangle differently. The LN yield may also represent a surrogate marker of surgical technique (which is easy to measure).

Snapshot of trauma laparotomy deaths in Queensland.

BACKGROUND: Trauma remains the most frequent cause of death for patients under 35 years of age. Head injury and catastrophic haemorrhage account for the majority of early deaths. A trauma laparotomy is often necessary to arrest haemorrhage. METHODS: All patients who died in Queensland hospitals between 2011 and 2016 having had a trauma laparotomy were identified from the Queensland Audit of Surgical Mortality. RESULTS: About 69.0% of the 84 deaths were male with a median age of 47.6 years. About 64.3% of deaths occurred within the first 2 days following trauma. Mechanism of injury was typically road traffic accident (77.4%). Sixteen patients underwent a non-therapeutic laparotomy. Following peer-review, different management was recommended for only three patients. CONCLUSION: This group of patients who died in the setting of a trauma laparotomy received high quality trauma care. Ongoing education is needed as some non-therapeutic laparotomies may be avoidable.

Benchmarking against the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit recommendations.

BACKGROUND: The Royal College of Anaesthetists published the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) to describe and compare inpatient care and outcomes of major emergency abdominal surgery in England and Wales in 2015 and 2016. The purpose of this article is to compare emergency abdominal surgical care and mortality in a regional hospital (Logan Hospital, Queensland, Australia) with NELA results. METHODS: Data were extracted from two databases. All deaths from May 2010 to April 2015 were reviewed and patients who had an emergency abdominal operation within 30 days of death were identified. The health records of all patients who underwent abdominal surgery were extracted and those who had an emergency laparotomy were identified for analysis. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty patients underwent emergency laparotomy and were included in the analysis. The total 30-day mortality during this 5-year period was 9.7%. Factors affecting mortality included age, Portsmouth-Physiological and Operative Severity Score (P-POSSUM) and admission source. Timing of antibiotic administration, use of perioperative medical service and frequency of intensive care admission were the same in patients who died and survived. CONCLUSION: Mortality in patients following emergency laparotomy at Logan Hospital compares favourably with 11.1% reported by NELA. This may be partly attributable to case mix distribution as for each P-POSSUM risk Logan Hospital mortality was at the upper end of that reported by NELA. Further Australia data are required. Improved compliance with NELA recommendations may improve outcomes.

Is cystic artery lymph node excision during laparoscopic cholecystectomy a marker of technique?

BACKGROUND: In order to minimize bile duct injury, experts suggest that dissection during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) should be performed lateral to the lymph node (LN). This study aims to determine whether the frequency of excision of the LN is related to patient factors, disease severity or surgical difficulty. METHODS: All LCs performed or supervised by one surgeon were identified from a prospective database. The presence of LN was retrospectively determined by reviewing the gallbladder histology report. RESULTS: The LN was identified in 10.4% of 1332 cholecystectomies. The American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3 was associated with a lower rate of LN excision compared with class 1 (odds ratio: 0.36; P = 0.049) as was the presence of a senior surgical trainee (odds ratio: 0.18; P < 0.001). Rate of LN excision was independent of patient demographic and clinical characteristics, including indication for cholecystectomy, conversion to open, gallbladder perforation, cholangiography, bile duct exploration and overall surgical difficulty. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency with which the LN is excised during LC by the one surgeon is independent of the majority of clinical and surgical factors and may represent a surrogate marker of surgical technique. Whether this is related to the rate of bile duct injury remains to be determined.

Clinical events reported by surgeons assessing their peers.

BACKGROUND: All surgical deaths in Queensland, Australia are reviewed by external surgeon peers, and clinical events are recorded. The study objective was to classify clinical events in surgical patients who died. METHODS: Deaths notified to the Queensland Audit of Surgical Mortality between 2007 and 2013 were assessed by surgeons' peers who decided whether a clinical event occurred. The most serious clinical event per patient was analyzed. RESULTS: Peer surgeons reviewed 4,816 deaths. Most patients (70.7%) had no clinical event. Events were preventable in 58% of patients and less than 1 in 10 events was severe. The most frequent events were classified as patient assessment (34.5%), suboptimal therapy (15.3%), and delays (15.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Peer review of all surgical deaths identifies preventable clinical events and provides opportunities to improve decision making, better therapy and reduce delay in implementing appropriate surgical care. Review feedback to surgeons and other stakeholders should improve patient safety and quality.